Gedit-color-schemes.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/gtksourceview-3.0/styles/Active4D.xml : Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.Ĭhecking: .rpm : Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. : Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. : Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag : Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file : Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. : No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. : Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). : Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. : Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least : Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. : Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. : Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. : Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. : Spec file is legible and written in American English. : Requires correct, justified where necessary. : If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and : Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. : Package does not generate any conflict. : Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. : Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory : Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. : Development files must be in a -devel package : Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. : Sources contain only permissible code or content. : Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. usr/share/gtksourceview-4/styles(gtksourceview4, gnome-builder) usr/share/gtksourceview-4(gtksourceview4, gnome-builder), usr/share/gtksourceview-3.0/styles(gnome-builder, gtksourceview3), usr/share/gtksourceview-3.0(gnome-builder, gtksourceview3), usr/share/gtksourceview-2.0/styles(gtksourceview2), usr/share/gtksourceview-2.0(gtksourceview2), : Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. : License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. Licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/gedit-color-schemes/review. Later)', 'GPL (v2 or later)', 'GNU Lesser General Public License (v2.1 Or later)', '*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License (v2 or Licensesįound: 'Unknown or generated', 'GNU Lesser General Public License (v2 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. : License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License(s) for the package is included in %license. License(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the

: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the Other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging : Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets Note: Installation errors (see attachment) = Pass, = Fail, = Not applicable, = Not evaluated Fix the obsolete FSF address and send a patch upstream? You probably need to remove these styles to avoid the conflict. These color schemes are not enabled by default, but are easily switched to in the preferences for both gnome terminal and gedit.Date should be the date you took the snapshot, not the date of the git commit.ĭEBUG util.py:582: Error: Transaction test error:ĭEBUG util.py:582: file /usr/share/gtksourceview-2.0/styles/cobalt.xml conflicts between attempted installs of and gtksourceview2-2.11.86_64ĭEBUG util.py:582: file /usr/share/gtksourceview-2.0/styles/oblivion.xml conflicts between attempted installs of and gtksourceview2-2.11.86_64ĭEBUG util.py:735: Child return code was: 1 I designed this colorscheme with both precise CIELAB lightness relationships and a refined set of hues based on fixed color wheel relationships. Solarized is a sixteen color palette (eight monotones, eight accent colors) designed for use with terminal and gui applications. Solarized comes in both light and dark variants, and really makes these applications look fantastic and works really well on a wide range of displays and screen brightness levels. One really nice improvement that i am enjoying on Fedora 21 is the addition of the solarized color scheme in both the default terminal ( gnome-terminal), and the default graphical text editior ( gedit). Recently, I have been using what will become Fedora 21 as my day-to-day machine, (side note: I have found it to be pretty stable for pre-release software).

Gedit color schemes